Having closely observed the content trajectory of JPS Jurassic Park Security, I find the shift toward a more aggressive 'corporate whistleblower' persona to be a brilliant move for audience retention. From a narrative architecture perspective, the integration of internal InGen memos with high-fidelity "leaked" security footage creates a cohesive alternate history that feels grounded in the film’s established canon. Specifically, the latest video regarding the "Asset Containment Failure in Sector 4" shows a marked improvement in color grading and Foley work—making the fictional archival footage feel authentic to the early 90s era. However, from an analytical standpoint, I wonder if the creator is leaning too heavily into the 'unreliable narrator' trope. While it builds mystery, it can occasionally muddy the timeline for those of us tracking the specific events leading up to the 1993 incident. How do you all feel about the pacing of these "leaks"? Does the slow-burn approach enhance the realism for you, or is it time for a more substantial reveal regarding the Wu-Hammond correspondence?