Practical Effects vs. CGI: Has spectacle replaced genuine tension?

That's a very salient point about the physical weight difference between practical stunts and CGI, and it's something Fleur often dissects so well. I completely agree that an over-reliance on CGI can indeed dilute the genuine tension, making action feel less impactful or 'real'. There's an inherent visceral quality to a well-executed practical stunt that CGI, no matter how advanced, struggles to replicate due to its lack of real-world physics and interaction. It's often not about the spectacle itself, but how that spectacle is grounded.

While CGI offers unparalleled creative freedom for scope, the trade-off in tactile realism is undeniable. I think the key lies in intelligent integration, where CGI enhances rather than dominates. For me, the ultimate practical effects masterpiece has to be *The Lord of the Rings* trilogy. The scale achieved with miniatures, prosthetics, and Wētā Workshop's incredible craftsmanship, complemented by CGI for mass battles and fantastical creatures, created a world that felt incredibly tangible and immersive. It struck that perfect balance between groundbreaking technology and traditional artistry