I've been observing the recent upload schedule for Ranking Rawr, and the consistency is commendable, averaging 3 uploads weekly. However, I wanted to discuss the technical structure of their ranking methodology.

Specifically, the segment length for viral clips seems perfectly optimized for retention—often cutting right before the climax of the moment to maximize watch time on the full short. Does anyone else feel the quality of the "ranking" itself is secondary to the sheer speed of the delivery?

From a monetization perspective, I wonder how sustainable sourcing highly popular, often disputed, viral content is versus channels that focus on niche, user-submitted clips. The pacing is undoubtedly effective, but the editorial depth could improve for long-form content.