Functional Training vs. Aesthetics: Where do we draw the line?

👤
StarLight 🎖️ Soldier 2023
Jan 18, 2026 14:02
Anthony often pushes the idea that movement quality and longevity should be the primary focus, arguing against purely aesthetic training goals (like just chasing massive arms). I totally get the philosophy—being strong for life matters more than having six-pack abs at 25. But here’s the tough question: Is it realistic to expect people to maintain peak motivation if they aren't seeing significant aesthetic changes? If Anthony’s advice is purely functional, does it risk alienating the vast majority of gym-goers whose initial entry point is wanting to look better? What do you guys prioritize when structuring your own workouts based on his advice? Let's discuss!
Discussion Stream
👤
ShadowPlay 👑 OG 2016 3 weeks, 5 days ago
Man, this debate is as old as the channel itself! I totally remember back in 2018 when he did that famous "Death of the Bicep Curl" video. He was already pushing back against chasing pure aesthetics even then.

You're right that results drive motivation, but Anthony’s whole brand is redefining *what* a result is. Remember his "Longevity vs. Look-gevity" series? That really hammered home that functional strength—being able to hike mountains at 70—is the ultimate aesthetic. People just need to commit to that mindset shift. That early content comparing powerlifting goals to everyday movement patterns was key to understanding his philosophy.

This thread is exclusive to subscribers.

Login to Reply