I have been conducting a comparative analysis of the channel's recent output against similar entities in the 'Knowledge/Society' niche. While the production quality is undeniably high, I am curious about the intended demographic. The linguistic markers used in the scripts suggest a desire for accessibility, yet some of the societal critiques feel structurally incomplete without further empirical data. Has anyone else noticed a trend in the recent metadata that suggests a push toward viral engagement rather than academic rigor? It would be interesting to see a breakdown of the viewer demographics to confirm this hypothesis. 📊🧠