I’ve been following legal cases involving police encounters for a long time. Remember when the distinction between a consensual encounter and a Terry stop felt much more defined in public discourse? It seems like lately, the interpretation of what constitutes "reasonable suspicion" has become much more fluid. I’m curious how you all feel the legal landscape has shifted since the early 2010s. Are there any specific cases or rulings you think really changed the way officers approach "investigative detentions" today compared to back then? I'm trying to get a better handle on the history of these precedents