Looking at the recent tactical shifts in top-flight football, there seems to be a growing disconnect between managerial philosophy and squad recruitment. When a head coach insists on a high-octane, front-foot pressing system—as we've seen attempted with several struggling squads this season—but the roster lacks the recovery speed or depth in the pivot, the results are often catastrophic on the counter-attack. In your professional opinion, is the failure of these "project" managers a result of tactical inflexibility, or is it simply a case of boards failing to provide players that meet the physical profile required for modern transition-heavy football? I'm particularly interested in whether the data on high-intensity sprints should dictate managerial appointments more than 'brand identity.'