I’ve been thinking a lot about the different interpretations of Superman, especially when he’s pushed to his limits. Do you guys think his "no-kill" preference and his farm-boy moral compass actually make him more vulnerable to villains who have zero restraint? Like, if he didn't care about collateral damage or "doing the right thing," he'd be unstoppable, but would he still be Superman? Also, what do you think about the way his powers are portrayed when he’s angry versus when he’s holding back? There's always that debate about whether he's a god trying to be a man or a man with the powers of a god. I’d love to hear some thoughts on which version of his morality works best in modern storytelling!